Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enda Mac Nally
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Enda Mac Nally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable artist: no refs to reliable sources, let alone substantial coverage of him, so he fails WP:BIO. A Google News search throws up no hits for him. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 19:18, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced and unreferenced probable vanity article. Dreamspy (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ww2censor (talk) 19:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nominator. asenine say what? 20:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom - unsourced, no asserted notability, etc. Guliolopez (talk) 12:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Not yet notable. Johnbod (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete.Red Hurley (talk) 18:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.