ambient crewmate and crewmate (ambient among us and etc) created by blitzdrachin
Parent: post #2912128 (learn more) show »
Description

oops

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • dragonyay said:
    laugh while you can, greedy
    keep supporting this people, this is not a trolling moderator.

    You do realized you're still continuing a petty drama after getting a record from your last comment?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 8
  • SnowWolf

    Former Staff

    dragonyay said:
    and please don't use bots to negative me

    You'll be happy to know that I just checked and there is no evidence of bot activity in your downvotes. There are really 29 people who've downvoted you. 31, actually, but you've gotten 2 upvotes, so you've got that going for you. (of course, one of them has gotten in trouble for encouraging piracy, while the other has apparently come out of a months long slumber to upvote you. How interesting.)

  • Reply
  • |
  • 16
  • snowwolf said:
    (of course, one of them has gotten in trouble for encouraging piracy, while the other has apparently come out of a months long slumber to upvote you. How interesting.)

    The past histories of people upvoting a comment matter nothing in regards to the present, it's a little strange to see that emphasized here, especially when you didn't do that to any of the people who downvoted the guy. Who cares what they did in the past?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -7
  • SnowWolf

    Former Staff

    midnite-sunrise said:
    The past histories of people upvoting a comment matter nothing in regards to the present, it's a little strange to see that emphasized here, especially when you didn't do that to any of the people who downvoted the guy. Who cares what they did in the past?

    I pointed out the piracy one, because encouraging piracy is the same entitled spirit that this guy's showing, while the other, I see more likely to potentially be a friend or something. it is *strange* when someone pops up after 2 months just to slap an upvote on a random comment, when all signs point to them not really being an active user. They're just both a little dubious, y'know? It wouldn't be the first time someone's gone to their friends and said "please upvote me."

    You might be right, though. Thank you for making me think about this.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
  • snowwolf said:
    I pointed out the piracy one, because encouraging piracy is the same entitled spirit that this guy's showing, while the other, I see more likely to potentially be a friend or something. it is *strange* when someone pops up after 2 months just to slap an upvote on a random comment, when all signs point to them not really being an active user. They're just both a little dubious, y'know? It wouldn't be the first time someone's gone to their friends and said "please upvote me."

    You might be right, though. Thank you for making me think about this.

    Hmm, I can certainly understand your viewpoint in regards to this. Thank you for responding in such a thoughtful manner as well -- it would seem I was downvoted by a few people myself. Oh well, thank you for considering what I said.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • dragonyay said:
    blitzdrachin,now he took and removed all the porn from here for the sake of stupid emojis? duped stupid fans around his finger, the best scam of the century, one person was right if you give a lot of money then you stop doing something. Keep protecting him, faceless

    what's that "updated by millcore" mean? did he add the red text?

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • midnite-sunrise said:
    The past histories of people upvoting a comment matter nothing in regards to the present, it's a little strange to see that emphasized here, especially when you didn't do that to any of the people who downvoted the guy. Who cares what they did in the past?

    I mean, the guy brought up the idea of being downvoted by bots as if to imply he didn't deserve those downvotes, so the response there was to clarify that no, it wasn't bots, and that negative number is a pretty accurate representation of what people think of his comment.

    Which is somewhat important because instead of thinking about why he was getting downvoted, he tried to deflect it by claiming it was simply one or two people using a bot, as if he wasn't the problem.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 6
  • Deez comments, guiz. I buy art on Gumroad and I still would be annoyed by delete-it-all, but I don't go all Gimmez All Things. <--- OK, maybe over the top imitation of leet spelling. 11 months too late, too. XD

    BTW: A lot of artists have "$0+" art packs right next to their works that have minimum of say, $5. Also, Booth lets you 'boost' (pun?) payments to artists, if you want. I've actually suggested to artists that they put up more of their works but at say, higher resolution or raw images, on there, for people that want to pay them but don't like subscription sites. There's also the convenience of just a huge ZIP file for a comic that encourages, that too.

    OK, sort of advertising but hell, if someone doesn't know what *insert subscription/art pack/donation site name* is, they probably didn't bother going to the artists' pages in the source links/wiki. I miss when Deviant Art was actually a relevant site, sigh...

    bepisboi69 said:
    It's a damn shame that the nsfw art is gone, but at least we get good sfw art!

    It's yet to be seen if it helps/hurts revenue?

  • Reply
  • |
  • -1